established, well-functioning, results management, monitoring, evaluation and learning system (for example, documented in a monitoring, evaluation, accountability and learning (MEAL) plan). Documentation ... and documentation of processes. The applicant must be able to document systems for monitoring, evaluation and learning (including for sub-grantees). f) Compliance with the zero-tolerance policy
established, well-functioning, results management, monitoring, evaluation and learning system (for example, documented in a monitoring, evaluation, accountability and learning (MEAL) plan). Documentation ... and documentation of processes. The applicant must be able to document systems for monitoring, evaluation and learning (including for sub-grantees). f) Compliance with the zero-tolerance policy
established, well-functioning, results management, monitoring, evaluation and learning system (for example, documented in a monitoring, evaluation, accountability and learning (MEAL) plan). Documentation ... and documentation of processes. The applicant must be able to document systems for monitoring, evaluation and learning (including for sub-grantees). f) Compliance with the zero-tolerance policy
32 Norad’s Governance and Public Finance ... Published: 15.12.2023 norad.no 3 Table of contents Introduction 4 Portfolio in brief 6 1. Knowledge development 9 1.1 Reducing inequality 9 1.2 Environmental crime, corruption and ... financing for development and relevant global anti-corruption arenas. 6 Portfolio in brief Portfolio objectives The overall objective of the portfolio (impact level) is for
Published: 15.12.2023 norad.no 3 Table of contents Introduction 4 Portfolio in brief 6 1. Knowledge development 9 1.1 Reducing inequality 9 1.2 Environmental crime, corruption and ... financing for development and relevant global anti-corruption arenas. 6 Portfolio in brief Portfolio objectives The overall objective of the portfolio (impact level) is for
ANNEXES 4-9 Country report: Democratic republic of the Congo D ep ar tm en t f or E va lu at io n Implementation and policy coherence: Evaluation of the interaction between Norwegian humanitarian ... humanitarian aid, development cooperation and peace efforts Evaluation of the Interaction between Norwegian HDP efforts Annexes p6 Annex 4: Theory of change The figure below represents in a
ANNEXES 4-9 Country report: Lebanon D ep ar tm en t f or E va lu at io n Implementation and policy coherence: Evaluation of the interaction between Norwegian humanitarian aid, development ... development cooperation and peace efforts Evaluation of the Interaction between Norwegian HDP efforts Annexes p8 Annex 4: Theory of change The figure below represents in a schematic way the Theory
ANNEXES 4-9 Country report: Ethiopia D ep ar tm en t f or E va lu at io n Implementation and policy coherence: Evaluation of the interaction between Norwegian humanitarian aid, development ... development cooperation and peace efforts Evaluation of the Interaction between Norwegian HDP efforts Annexes p7 Annex 4: Theory of change The figure below represents in a schematic way the Theory
en t f or E va lu at io n Evaluation of the interaction between Norwegian humanitarian aid, development cooperation and peace efforts REPORT 6, 2023 Country report: Lebanon The report is ... is commissioned by the Department for Evaluation in Norad. The Department for Evaluation is responsible for conducting independent evaluations of activities funded over the ODA budget. The department is
en t f or E va lu at io n Evaluation of the interaction between Norwegian humanitarian aid, development cooperation and peace efforts REPORT 8, 2023 Country report: Ethiopia The report is ... is commissioned by the Department for Evaluation in Norad The Department for Evaluation is responsible for conducting independent evaluations of activities funded over the ODA budget. The department is