Evaluation of the Strategy for Norway’s Culture and Sports Cooperation with Countries in the South Report 3/2011 – Evaluation Evaluation Department Norad Norwegian Agency for Development ... findings and recommendations rest with the evaluation team. The views and opinions expressed in the report do not necessarily correspond with those of Norad”. Evaluation of the Strategy for Norway’s Culture
contributed to the overall re-establishment of subsistence activities in Sinkat constituency. The evaluation results also indicate a growing sense of self-reliance amongst farmers, pastoralists and women ... agriculture and education to reach more beneficiaries. Comments from the organisation The project evaluation report was thoroughly discussed in Sinkat. A consultant from the Palestine Red Crescent Society
Sports for social inclusion 37 Background KRIK and CHRISC works to enhance potential of young people in the East Africa region through sports. CHRISC became registered as organizations ... network of volunteers and partner organizations. Purpose/objective The primary objective of the evaluation is to evaluate the project's relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact and sustainability. Methodology
DFID (2006), Evaluation of DFID’s Policy and Practice in Support of Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment. Volume 1. Synthesis Report. European Commission (2003), Thematic evaluation of the integration ... Final Report. International Labour Office (2005), Thematic evaluation report: Gender issues in Technical cooperation. Norad (2005), Evaluation of the ‘Strategy for Women and Gender Equality in Development
Lutheran Church Development Foundation (DF) has been under implementation since 2008. This mid-term evaluation was commissioned by Normisjon, the sole donor to the program. The Adivasi people and the poorest ... contribution of the DF Board in relation to the ICCB program • Assess to which extent the monitoring and evaluation system is enabling good management and appropriate reporting. • Assess to what degree Financial
Evaluation Report 3/2000 The Project “Training for Peace in Southern Africa” Royal Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Af fairs Information from the Royal Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs The Ministry’s ... Responsibility for the contents and presentation of findings and recommendations rests with the evaluation team. The views and opinions expressed in the report do not necessarily correspond with the views
development cooperation treaties between the Norwegian Government and the government of a Partner country. The template should only be used in the cases listed in Section 1.1 of MFA’s Directives for Entering ... <Partner country> regarding development cooperation concerning <name of programme> WHEREAS the Government of the Kingdom of Norway (Norway) and the Government of the Republic of <Partner country> (<Partner
development cooperation treaties between the Norwegian Government and the government of a Partner country. The template should only be used in the cases listed in Section 1.1 of MFA’s Directives for Entering ... <Partner country> regarding development cooperation concerning <name of programme> WHEREAS the Government of the Kingdom of Norway (Norway) and the Government of the Republic of <Partner country> (<Partner
Purpose/objective This final evaluation has been commissioned by HimalPartner in line with their normal practice of monitoring and timely review of their funded projects. The evaluation includes consideration ... ‘fifth year’ which inevitably will be very different than originally envisioned. Methodology This evaluation is based on: reading of project document and reports to the funder, interviews with key stakeholders
End-Review of the Norwegian Support to the Non-Petroleum Energy Sector in Angola with a focus on 2002-2006 and Identification of Opportunities for Future Cooperation /no/resultater/publikasjoner/publikasjon?key=109791 ... components of the programme. This key risk could have been mitigated - at least in part - by sustained in-country support. • Regarding opportunities for future cooperation a key impediment to the realisation of