development paradigm Evaluation of Norwegian support to promote the rights of persons with disabilities Country study of the Palestinian territory – Summary, with Arabic translation Evaluation Department ... NORAD EVALUATION DEPARTMENT Mainstreaming disability in the new development paradigm Evaluation of Norwegian support to promote the rights of persons with disabilities, 2000 – 2010
research conducted by the countries’ own researchers. Based on a needs assessment in the relevant country, NORHED projects may include institutional capacity building elements like joint Norwegian-South ... • In Low and Middle Income Countries: Higher Education Institutions accredited/recognised by in-country national authorities. Countries must be listed in OECD DAC’s register of official development assistance
Evaluation Report 1/2004 Ministry of Foreign Af fairs Towards a Strategic Framework for Peacebuilding: Getting Their Act Together Overview report of the Joint Utstein Study of Peacebuilding ... Oslo Commissioned by the Evaluation Department of the Royal Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs for the Joint Utstein Study of Peacebuilding conducted with the Evaluation Departments of the German
å nå flere, også internasjonalt. Avdelingen utviklet et nytt produkt i 2016, såkalte Country Evaluation Briefs (CEBs), og ferdigstilte CEB-rapporter for Afghanistan, Sør-Sudan og Mosambik. Produktets ... Evalueringsavdelingen ble det i 2016 gjennomført to studier og tre evalueringer, samt tre country evaluation briefs. I tillegg ble fem rapporter utarbeidet i samarbeid med de uavhengige evalueringskontorene
NORHED Higher Education and Research for Development NORHED in brief • Aims to increase academic capacities in developing countries • Collaborative partnerships between higher education institutions ... NORHED sub-programmes 2013: Main call and NORHED projects selected for support 2014: Evaluation of NORHED initiated 2014-18: Project implementation Contact information Website: www.norad.no/norhed
of these authorities? 3.2 In addition to anything mentioned under point 2.3 above, please give a brief account of how the Project has safeguarded the following cross-cutting issues: · anti-corruption ... the Project? · Have external reviews/evaluations been sent to Norad’s evaluation database? · Please state the type of evaluation – external/independent, internal or a mixture of external/internal. 5
of these authorities? 3.2 In addition to anything mentioned under point 2.3 above, please give a brief account of how the Project has safeguarded the following cross-cutting issues: · anti-corruption ... the Project? · Have external reviews/evaluations been sent to Norad’s evaluation database? · Please state the type of evaluation – external/independent, internal or a mixture of external/internal. 5
development cooperation projects financed? Please fill in the form below: (All amounts in NOK) Country of Project From Norad From the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs From other governmental ... 2.1. Basic information about the project: a. Project name in English: [ ] b. Region/country: [ ] c. Previous support from Norad for this particular project: Year: [ ]
provide technical support to partners. The civil society organizations we have reviewed under this evaluation accomplished a great deal of „their planned activities „ provided that the issues they address ... challenging particularly within the weak institutional as well as policy environment of the country. The evaluation team tried to measure the projects‟ achievement in light of this context. The team learnt
and last year, 16 million adoles- cents under the age of 19 became pregnant. I have worked at country level, where it is “normal” for children to miss up to three months of school every year because ... critical first step in adopting a rights-based approach to women’s and children’s health. For a country, this means full compliance with the legal obligations of State parties as set out in article