Søk

16.02.2015

NORADs development cooperation manual.doc

activities. Through its aggregated reports it is also the basis for planning and reporting on total, country and sector levels. APS Agreed Programme Summary NORAD signifies, NORAD, Oslo For the sake of simplicity ... minor part of the total funding, is referred to as the Grant. The total Norwegian commitment to a country is referred to as the Development Co-operation Programme. Request signifies a document "authorising"

16.02.2015

Eritrea FGM Report _final_.pdf

..........................................................................................6 2.3 Brief Overview of Actors Involved in FGM/C in Eritrea ...................................7 3. The Two ... Natal Care ARSH Adolescence Reproductive and Sexual Health CA Change Agents CPAP Country Programme Action Plan FGM/C Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting FRHAE Family and Reproductive

16.02.2015

CERF review final _ appendices1.pdf

Interim Review Final Report Submitted to: Evaluation and Studies Section Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs By: Sheila Dohoo ... the field offices of the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs who coordinated the country case studies, often during busy periods for humanitarian response operations. They would also like

16.02.2015

ER_6.87.pdf

< THE ROYAL NORWEGIAN MINISTRY OF DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION s Evaluation Report 6.87 V.*-* £.\ v\ w A Promoting imports from developing countries An independent report by Arne Melchior ... period April - October 1987, the Fund for Market and Distribution Research (FMD) carried out an evaluation of measures to promote imports from developing countries into Norway, with main emphasis on the

05.12.2010

Review of Livelihoods and Economic Recovery in Northern Uganda (LEARN) – a cash transfer programme in support of the IDP return and recovery process

LRA Livelihood and Economic Recovery Programme Lord’s Resistance Army M&E Monitoring and evaluation MTR Mid Term Review MISR Makerere Institute of Social Research NGO Non-governmental Organization ... defined operational approaches and potential implementing partners, and suggested monitoring and evaluation principles and mechanisms. In 2008, RNE launched a Call for Proposals for “Cash Transfer in

16.02.2015

Integrated Program for Sustainable Women Development.pdf

areas. SUS has a typical organizational structure commonly found with NGO community of the country: a General Body of 31 members from the locality, an Executive Committee of 9 members, Executive ... the out set, it was agreed with SF that the present study would not be a rigorous quantitative evaluation of the project. It will rather be a review based on discussion and observations of the activities

16.02.2015

Madagascar final report 22 1 2010.pdf

Johannesburg, South Africa has a general budget. In addition there is a separate budget for each country where EISA is working. The national EISA-office in Antananarivo has 2 staff members. The Madagascar ... 2008-2010: Women’s participation in and contribution to governance in Madagascar, is based on the evaluation of the program in 2007. This new programme has four main activities: - Development of national

16.02.2015

Part ll 09 JFA Programme Support 03-09-2013.docx

the Partner country enters into the JFA at the governmental level, modifications must be made in the first paragraph of the template and “the Ministry” must be replaced by “Partner country” throughout ... Normally the JFA is assessed in the AD for the bilateral agreement to be entered into with the Partner country. If this is not the case, a separate written assessment of the JFA must be made before the matter

16.02.2015

Improving Health for Women in the Netrakona Region in Bangladesh.pdf

1 Midterm evaluation of the project: Improving Health for Women in the Netrakona Region in Bangladesh Applicant organization: Internasjonal Dugnads Kvinnegruppe (ID), (the Norwegian branch ... partner: Sabalamby Unnayan Samity (SUS). Project duration: 2005–2007 Midterm evaluation: October–November 2006 Evaluation visiting-team: Ms Mirjam Lukasse and Ms Marit Heiberg. Ms Lukasse wrote the

16.02.2015

Organisational review of Norcross.pdf

................................................................................... 21 5.2.1. Brief Background ...................................................................................... ... .................................................................. 29 9.2. PROJECT ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION ..............................................................................................