Evaluation Report 3.96 The Norwegian People's Aid Mine Clearance Project in Cambodia \ v\ by Coopers and Ly brand Consulting ANS / «'i 1 ! Ii tf i o\ is Si - , tf! oi tfQ ... recommendations 6 6 6 7 1.1 Brief project history 1.2 Conclusions 1.3 Recommendations 1.4 Plan for continuation - phasing out plan 9 2. Background 1 2.1 Background for evaluation ] 2.2 Description of
Final evaluation of CODE “Improving the learning conditions of Children from Chota Province” CAJAMARCA REGION – PERU 471036 NORAD State of report: Final version January 2004 Client of evaluation: Stromme ... ............. 5 2.1 Background for the evaluation ......................................................................................... 6 2.2 Evaluation methodology ............................
Mid Term Review of TIM 2010 : Assistance in developing ... 5 World Bank (August, 2005): World Bank Country Assistance Strategy for Timor-Leste FY 06-08 - The Bridge Group AS - Assistance in Developing ... petroleumssektoren 10 Norad; Notat 21.06.2002 11 Norad (2007); Evaluation of the Norwegian Petroleum-related Assistance, Evaluation Report 1/2007 12 Kvadsheim; 27.03.2007 13 TIM 2010 Appropriation
were members of the Ecuador team. We were well supported with translation and help to understand country contexts by Fernanda Mausse in Mozambique and Cristina Santacruz in Ecuador. It has been a participatory ... review, but Norad decided to let the two external consultants be responsible for preparing the Country Reports and Synthesis Report. All members have commented on and made contributions to the reports
Global Aid Architecture and the Health Millennium Development Goals Study Report 1/2009 Evaluation Department Norad Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation P.O.Box 8034 Dep, NO-0030 Oslo ... “Responsibility for the contents and presentation of findings and recommendations rest with the evaluation team. The views and opinions expressed in the report do not necessarily correspond with those
building in reporting Paragraph 9 (Review and Evaluation) Good practices: review and evaluation Review and evaluation (aligned support) Review and evaluation (not aligned support) Paragraph 10 (Audit) ... a lead donor may lead to substantial savings in time and money, for both donors and the partner country. It is also possible to combine the JFA and the DCA arrangement. A JFA can have one or more donors
Norway Evaluation TELE- COMMUNICATIONS IN THE SADCC REGION SUMMARY by The Centre for Development and Technology University of Trondheim GENERAL ANALYSIS OF SECTOR POLICY EVALUATION OF ... TELECOMM|NjC|| ION|| v*N\ «-»-*•.-*"-'*'*' PREFACE The present telecommunications sector evaluation study has consist- ed of two phases. The first phase comprised the desk study resulting in an
implementation and delivery of the development of Hulhumalé. Page 2 of 18 Evaluation Process 1) The EOI does not constitute a solicitation. The Housing Development Corporation ... of the solicitation when issued. 2) Upon receipt of the expression of interest, a preliminary evaluation based on the background and capacity of the parties will be conducted to shortlist the candidates
................................... 7 1.2 Brief Presentation of Funding and Programmes ....................................................... 7 1.3 Brief Overview of the Project Partners .......... ... see where what type of support is most needed. 2. Consider supporting a Phased Monitoring and Evaluation effort which takes into account the time needed to effectively train counterparts, the capacity
to meet the planned results of the Programme. The recommendations provided in the Itad-report “Evaluation of Norwegian Support to Capacity Development”, 2015 shall be taken into account in the assignment ... shall be held as soon as possible after signing the contract, where the consultant will present a brief Mission Preparation Note (see details below). The work shall include a 10-day fact-finding mission