1 REPORT ON FINAL EVALUATION OF PROJECT “YOUNG MOTHER CENTRE (CMA)” PROJECT No. 471053 Project period 2000-2005 Implementing organization: CENTER OF PRODUCTIVE AND TECHNICAL ... 2. Type of evaluation (Intermediate, final, etc.) FINAL EVALUATION 3. Date: (Year and month) 24-11-2005 to 2-1-2006 4. Owner of the evaluation (Who asked for the evaluation) STROMME
23 98 00 00 Fax: +47 23 98 00 99 No. of Copies: 400 postmottak@norad.no www.norad.no Norad Evaluation Department Norad Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation P.O.Box 8034 Dep, NO-0030 Oslo ... findings, interpretations and conclusions presented do not necessarily reflect the views of Norad Evaluation Department. Hunting for Per Diem The Uses and Abuses of Travel Compensation in Three Developing
Evaluation/Study/5/2004 Study of the impact of the work of FORUT in Sri Lanka: Building Civil Society Norad Direktoratet for utviklingssamarbeid Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation Pb ... organisational cultures ...............................................................47 5 Evaluation Study 5. 2004 ADIC Alcohol and Drug Information Centre CBO Community based organisation CSF
recommendations 39 Executive summary Background 1. This mid-term review provides an evaluation of the programme, ‘Formative Process Research on Regional Integration in Southern Africa’ (FOPRISA) ... resources. Their re- mit also includes policy development, strategic planning, monitoring and evaluation, harmonisation and coordination of regional policies and pro- grammes. In this regard they are
Teacher Education in Southern Sudan Supported by Norwegian Church Aid “Pre-service, In-service and Phase training courses” /no/resultater/publikasjoner/publikasjon?key=117408 Background ... develop the teacher education, as well as continued support to different teacher training modes. The evaluation was initiated to identify the effect of NCAs contribution, and to pave a way forward. Purpose/objective
Global Aid Architecture and the Health Millennium Development Goals Study Report 1/2009 Evaluation Department Norad Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation P.O.Box 8034 Dep, NO-0030 Oslo ... “Responsibility for the contents and presentation of findings and recommendations rest with the evaluation team. The views and opinions expressed in the report do not necessarily correspond with those
Rapport ... and to design future programs. This review is not intended to serve as an endline evaluation, and such an evaluation is planned for the end of the program. Key findings of this review include: ... as the most effective; additional, updated quantitative data is needed, as a part of a future evaluation, to triangulate the findings of this review. Recom m endations 1. Implement school-driven
Evaluation Report 4/2007 Evaluation of Norwegian Development Support to Zambia (1991 – 2005) Case Studies: Wildlife Management and Natural Resources Transparency in Financial Management Agriculture ... findings and recommendations rest with the evaluation team. The views and opinions expressed in the report do not necessarily correspond with those of Norad. Evaluation of Norwegian Development Support to
Funds USD United States Dollar VCT/ATV Voluntary Counselling and Testing M&E Monitoring and Evaluation YFHS Youth Friendly Health Services 22/04/2008 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ... Education and Communication (IEC)......................................... 23 3.1.7 Monitoring and Evaluation............................................................................... 23 3.1.8 Field
EVALUATION OF CITIZENS’VOICE & ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE & DONOR APPROACHES REPORT ev al u at io n Authors: TAMMIE O’NEIL, MARTA FORESTI & ALAN HUDSON Front cover photograph ... photograph courtesy of Marta Foresti Evaluation of Citizens’ Voice and Accountability: Review of the Literature and Donor Approaches By Tammie O’Neil, Marta Foresti and Alan Hudson August