Søk

Ditt søk på Country evaluation briefs gav 2052 treff
Sorter etter: Relevans Dato
08.02.2012

Activity Based Financial Flows in UN System: a Study of Select UN Organisations

Activity Based Financial Flows in UN System: a Study of Select UN Organisations /no/resultater/publikasjoner/publikasjon?key=388710 90 At the end of the year, UN agencies have a build-up ... also been conducted with the staff at the head offices of the various UN agencies, as well as the country offices in Uganda and Vietnam. The study also documents the development in the revenues of the agencies

20.05.2019

Adapting agriculture to climate change: collecting, protecting and preparing crop wild relatives

insights in capabilities of partners and implementers, while also obtaining intelligence on specific country and institutional frameworks and challenges. The partnership of the Crop Trust with MSB has been ... insights generated. Various partners engaged in phone and video conference conversations. During country visits to 10 countries, partners in the CWR Project received review team members with hospitality

29.05.2018

Tax in Development: Towards a Strategic Aid Approach

37 Raising a higher share of the value added in an economy for the public purpose is associated with state building, modern economic growth and development. From 2002-3 to date, low- and ... sub-Saharan Africa. Links are provided to the Norwegian partner country categorisation to illustrate the correlation between these two types of country ranking/prioritisation. Finally, other factors relating to

23.01.2009

Maidema Eye Health Centre (Trianing Centre and Eye Clinic) A summative evalutation 1996-2007

The report is the result of an external, summative evaluation of the operations at Maidema Eye Health Centre from 1996 to 2007. This summative evaluation gives a review of Maidema`s performance since its ... its start in 1996 Purpose/objective The purpose of the evaluation is to assess whether the project has achieved its objectives or not. The evaluation should provide a summary of lessons learned during the

14.11.2011

Final report-Strengthening Community Capacity for Fisheries Co-management (SCCaFCoM) in Rufiji, Mafia and Kilwa districts (Tanzania)

equitable utilisation, management and protection of marine and coastal resources”. Methodology: The evaluation was conducted through reviews of key project documents as well as meetings and discussions with ... of all aspects of the project and to get consensus on issues raised. As a final evaluation, the focus of the evaluation was on achievements and impacts at the purpose and goal levels. Key findings:  Awareness

03.06.2018

Evalueringsavdelingens årsrapport 2017/2018: Forutsetninger for at evalueringer får betydning

tematisk eller landspesifikk bruk av norsk finansiering RAPPORT 7/2017 Real-time evaluation of NICFI: An evaluation of empowerment of indigenous peoples and forest dependent local communities through ... oppnås står i stor grad ‘hver for seg’ og ikke som del RAPPORT 9/2017 Realising Potential: Evaluation of Norway’s Support to Education in Conflict and Crisis through Civil Society Organisations

28.05.2009

Organisational Review of the Development Cooperation by the Union of Education Norway

Organisational Review of the Development Cooperation by the Union of Education Norway /no/resultater/publikasjoner/publikasjon?key=125149 76 Introduction This report presents the outcome of an ... the organisation and management systems applied by UEN in implementing its support to developing country partners, not on effectiveness, outcomes and impact of the support provided by UEN. The main focus

29.08.2017

Building Agro - pastoral communities´ resilience and strengthening livelihoods in Somaliland

Purpose/objective The main purpose of the evaluation was to address some of the challenging issues when working with increasing livelihoods and food security in Somaliland. The evaluation should assess the programme ... livelihoods- and diaspora components. Finally, the evaluation should draw lessons and recommendations for the new programme period (2017-2020). Methodology The evaluation team applied primarily qualitative methods